NJ Appellate Law Blog

Supreme Court Schedules Briefing on Senatorial Election Challenge

The Supreme Court has issued a schedule for briefing on the emergent appeal by parties challenging Governor Christie's scheduling of special elections to fill the United States Senate seat held by Senator Lautenberg...

Appellate Division Rejects Challenge to Special Senatorial Election Process

Having agreed to review on an emergent basis an attack on Governor Christie's decision to schedule a special primary in August and a general election in October to fill the...

A Jury, Not a Judge, Must Decide Contested Tort Claims Act Issue of Whether a Public Entity Exercised Discretionary Decisionmaking or Undertook a Mere Ministerial Act

Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation Authority, 430 N.J. Super. 485 (App. Div. 2013). The key issue in this case, in which the opinion of the Appellate Division was written by Judge Fasciale, was...

Is Mandatory Judicial Retirement at 70 Unconstitutional?

Article VI, section 6, paragraph 3 of the New Jersey Constitution provides that Justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Superior Court "shall be retired upon attaining the...

New Jersey Law Firms May Now Use Some Trade Names

In re Letter Decision of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, Docket No. 47-2007, 213 N.J. 171 (2013). New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 7.5 requires that a law firm's name "include the...

A Smorgasbord, Courtesy of Judge Fisher: Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, and Service of Process

Tatham v. Tatham, 429 N.J. Super. 502 (App. Div. 2013). It is not often that a family law opinion touches on so many fundamental procedural issues. This opinion by Judge Fisher addresses...

Mootness

Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S.Ct. 1017 (2013). Mr. Chafin, a United States citizen serving in the military, and Ms. Chafin, a citizen of the United Kingdom, had a daughter, E.C. When...

Mount Laurel's Ban on Billboards is Not Unconstitutional

Interstate Outdoor Advertising, L.P. v. Mt. Laurel Tp. Bd. of Adj., 706 F.3d 527 (3d Cir. 2013). The Township of Mount Laurel, best known for its role in a series of affordable...

Gun Group's Pre-emption and Due Process Challenges to "One Gun Law" are Shot Down

Association New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Governor of the State of New Jersey, 707 F.3d 238 (3d Cir. 2013). In this opinion by Judge Sloviter, the Third Circuit deservedly gave...

Roe v. Wade

Today is the fortieth anniversary of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). That decision, written by Justice Blackmun, an appointee of President Nixon, and joined in by Justices as...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 343536 37 38 39 40 41…Last

Appellate Division Oral Argument of the (Upcoming) Week: A $55 Million Tort Verdict

On Tuesday, November 18, judges on Part D will hear oral argument in Rider v. Jersey City Transfer, Inc. The case arose out of an auto accident in Maryland, in which plaintiff, after striking one vehicle with her own car and getting out of the car, was hit by a tractor-trailer owned by defendant. Plaintiff suffered grisly injuries, sued, and obtained a judgment of over $59 million once the $55 million jury verdict was molded. Defendants appealed....

Liability of a General Contractor for Injuries to a Subcontractor's Employee: The Supreme Court Will Decide the Applicable Standard

The Supreme Court announced that it has granted certification in Campoverde v. NY-NJ Link Developer, LLC. The question presented, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk's office, is "What is the applicable standard under New Jersey law for determining whether a general contractor owes a duty to a subcontractor's employees for the purpose of determining liability for the injuries sustained by a subcontractor's employee?"...

Proposed New Supreme Court Briefing Procedures

The Supreme Court issued a Notice, available here, that proposes to revolutionize the process for briefing in the Supreme Court. If adopted, the new procedures would require substantial revisions to Rule 2:12, which currently governs Supreme Court briefing....

Appellate Division Oral Argument of the Week: An Open Public Meetings Act Appeal

On Thursday, November 13, judges on Part C of the Appellate Division will hear oral argument in Arminio v. Monroe Township Board of Education. The case raises several issues under the Open Public Meetings Act, N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 et seq. ("OPMA")....