The Supreme Court has announced that it has granted review in two new matters. One is on a familiar subject: affidavits of merit in professional liability cases. The other involves the ethics of referral fees.

The referral fee matter is In re Opinion No. 745 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics. The Court granted a petition for review in this case. The question presented, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s office, is “May a certified trial attorney pay referral fees to out-of-state lawyers under the New Jersey Rules of Court and the Rules of Professional Conduct?” The Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics held that certified civil trial attorneys generally may not pay referral fees to out-of-state lawyers.

The affidavit of merit case is Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health, in which the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal. The question presented there is “In this medical malpractice matter in which the treating doctor was board certified in internal medicine and gastroenterology, was plaintiffs’ affidavit of merit from a doctor board certified in internal medicine sufficient?” As summarized here, in an opinion reported at 478 N.J. Super. 355 (App. Div. 2024), a three-judge panel of the Appellate Division ruled that the affidavit of merit was not sufficient, as the affiant needed to be certified in both of the defendant doctor’s specialties. The appeal appears to center on the proper interpretation of Buck v. Henry, 207 N.J. 377 (2011). The Supreme Court can now tell everyone which approach to Buck is proper.